Quantcast
Channel: Military & Defense
Viewing all 31607 articles
Browse latest View live

This British Terror Cell Was Plotting A Creative Rampage Before Their Arrest

$
0
0

car, parking lot, parking, cars

A British terror cell allegedly planned to buy five AK47 assault rifles by borrowing £100,000 in loans, a court heard.

The alleged ringleader of a British jihadist group, Irfan Naseer, boasted how he could buy a grenade for £1,500 and a M16 assault rifle.

Secretly recorded conversations heard the group saying they could get the weapons from a “gangster” they knew but Naseer says he couldn’t go to him because “he knows what I want to do”, Woolwich Crown Court heard.

The al-Qaeda inspired gang, from Birmingham, is accused of plotting to use eight suicide bombers to detonate rucksacks packed with explosives in crowded places to cause “mass death” and carnage on the streets of Britain.

Naseer, 31, Irfan Khalid, 27, and Ashik Ali, 27, all unemployed from Birmingham, are the alleged “senior members” and were among 12 people arrested and charged last year.

The trio deny between them a total of 12 terror charges including planning a bombing campaign, recruiting others for terrorism and terrorism fundraising.

In one conversation recorded by the police the group are discussing how to obtain weapons.

Naseer said that “out there in the market: “You can buy M16 you can buy AK.”

He added: “You can get grenades, you know grenades? Fifteen hundred pounds for one grenade.”

He said: “I’m trying to do that…take out loan.

“Get about 100 grand then you get four five AK’s ready.”

Yesterday, the jury heard how the group talked about getting guns from the “black geezers” and storming in to a synagogue and other places.

They also discussed killing 1,000 people by lacing hand cream with poison and smearing it on car and door handles.

Naseer, also known as Chubbs because of his size, said people would start dying within five minutes of coming in to contact with it when they went to work in the morning.

He said: "Make it and put it inside like, you know like Vaseline or cream like that, like Nivea cream and put it on people's cars.

"You know like the door handles on a whole, imagine putting it on whole like area innit overnight and when they come in the morning to work they start touching the, they open the door and then five minutes they die man, all of them start dying and that, kill about 1,000 people."

Naseer justified attacking non-believers because they have “sex like donkeys”, orgies and took drugs. He said: “They wanna you know have sex like donkeys on the street, they wanna club, act like animals and why shouldn’t we terrorise them, tell me that?”

Brian Altman QC, prosecuting, told the jury: “He is disdainful of Western values so why should he not terrorise them.”

Mr Altman said had the plot been permitted to run its course it “would have culminated in death and injury on a massive scale”.

The trial continues.

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


This Attack Plan For Iran Is So Extensive There's No Way The US Could Go It Alone

$
0
0

With Britain questioning the legality of a strike on Iran, denying the U.S. access to pivotal airbases, and the U.S. presidential election just days away, we wanted to re-examine how extensive an endeavor a strike on Iran would be. 

Washington D.C. foreign policy think tank the Center For Strategic & International Studies took a long hard look at what it really means to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions, what it would take, and what it could lead to in a report last month authored by the renowned Anthony Cordesman.

The speculation that Israel can go it alone against Tehran remains, but the specifics of what's required by a US attack to put the nuclear program in the dust is outlined in detail. At least 16 F-18s, and 10 B-2 bombers carrying 30,000 pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs, would initially be required by US forces. The U.S. fleet of B-2s called for here are largely stationed in the U.S. and though aerial refueling is common, where those tankers may fly from is limited.

Iran's retaliation would be another story entirely with a massive incoming missile salvo directed about the entire region. When that happens a full ballistic missile war could ensue with untold US space, air, sea, and land elements coming into play.

Some illustrations of the possible outcomes are below.

Iran

Iran

Iran

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's Why Israel (Probably) Bombed A Factory In Sudan

$
0
0

israel

If Israel was behind the bombing of a Sudanese munitions plant on Wednesday—as everyone assumes it was—then it's easy to recognize the motives for such a mission.

Israeli military commentators said that the Yarmouk arms factory was owned by Iran and used to supply arms to Hamas in Gaza, The Guardian reports. Leaked U.S. State Department documents from three years ago support this report, according to the BBC.

A UN source told The Guardian that the "Egyptians have told us that the arms flowing into Sinai [and possibly to Gaza] from Sudan are a big security problem" and that recent clashes in which Israel and Egyptian troops have engaged armed radical Bedouin groups are connected to the strike in Khartoum.

"In the same days we've seen a dramatic increase in rockets fired into Israel from Gaza," the UN official said. "The convergence of these elements points to Israel as the perpetrator."

Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak declined to comment, but influential former general and senior defence ministry official Amos Gilad praised the country's air force and called Sudan a "terrorist state" Israel Army Radio.

Sudan's Information Minister Ahmed Belal Osman told reporters that the East African country "thinks Israel did the bombing," citing that the four radar-evading aircraft "appeared to come from the east" and that evidence pointing to Israel had been found among remnants of the explosives.

"There is no doubt that the explosion in Khartoum will be food for thought not only for the authorities in Sudan but also in Gaza – and especially in Tehran," Ron Ben-Yishai, a veteran military commentator, wrote in daily newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth about what would have been 1,000-mile bombing raid for Israel.

SEE ALSO: Benjamin Netanyahu Just Became The 'Israeli Glenn Beck' >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Here Are The 10 Coolest Military Robots You've Never Heard About

$
0
0

BEAR bot robots

Like it or not, robots are swiftly making their way deeper and deeper into battlefield operations.

Though the airborne drone seems to take precedent, both in combat operations as well as media coverage, there are a few robots bubbling beneath the public consciousness that hardly anyone talks about.

Here are a few of the coolest bots no one seems to notice.

The U.S. Marine Corps Gladiator Tactical Unmanned Ground Vehicle packs a punch, with missiles and machine gun mounts

The Gladiator is the coolest remote control car anyone can own.

From a Marine Corps article:

The Gladiator is loaded with all sorts of gadgets and weaponry, including day and night cameras, a chemical detection system, Light Vehicle Obscuration Smoke System, and is mounted with either M249 Squad Automatic Weapon, the M240G Medium Machine Gun, 9 mm Uzi or an Anti-Personnel/Obstacle Breaching System (APOBS).



The U.S. Army's XM1219 Armed Robotic Vehicle can drive over just about anything, and kill bad guys

If it looks badass, it probably is.

The 7-ton Armed Robotic Vehicle, or ARV, is capable of carrying a ton, that's 2000 lbs, of weaponry. Deployable from a variety of airborne troops carriers, to include the C-130 cargo plane and the CH-46 helicopter.

It incorporates a 'man-in-the-loop' semi autonomous firing system, which boasts the capability for common missiles, hellfire missiles, medium machine gun systems as well as the 30mm Mk 44 chain gun.

It's mobile enough to follow the ground infantry almost anywhere, and it can even carry them in tougher terrain.

This is not one remote control car you're going to find under the Christmas tree.



The U.S. Navy's 'MacGuyver' Bot is the next generation of automated disaster relief

Designers put the MacGuyver Bot together with disaster relief in mind. It's arms and hands are incredibly dexterous, enabling the bot to literally 'make' tools on the spot, depending on what it needs to help humans out of tight positions.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

8 Reasons Why The Syrian Ceasefire Was Doomed

$
0
0

syria

The Syrian ceasefire 'agreement' was reported with optimism—and there was a lull in the fighting as it went into effect today at dawn—but it's fallen apart since then.

In the morning there were there were heavy clashes in the north. and Reuters reports that a Damascus car bomb has shattered the truce."

One activist groups has counted at least 110 casualties around the country today (as of two hours ago).

Considering that past ceasefire efforts have collapsed as both sides refused to lay down their arms, it's no wonder this temporary truce was destined to fail. Here's eight reasons why::

1. The two sides have been fighting for 19 months

This civil war has been going on for 19 months. It's a bit naive to think that a four-day truce—which has no stated plans for its aftermath—is going to factor into the big picture.

Last year during Eid al-Adha (which fell on Nov. 6-7) Syrian troops descended on a defiant neighborhood in Homs, kicking in doors and making arrests following weeks of violence.

2. It's unmonitored

The truce—proposed by U.N.-Arab League envoy Lakhdar Brahimi and endorsed by the Security Council—was set for only the four days of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, but there were no arrangements for monitoring compliance.

3. Assad's government was quick to accept the loose truce

Assad is commanding a well-equipped, entrenched force that has everything to gain from a ceasefire during an insurrection. 

Assad can go pray while Syrian Army command can claim that it "implemented ceasefire, but has responded to rebel "violations" across the country."

Note: It was Russia reassured the world that Bashar al-Assad's regime was going to accept the UN ceasefire proposal. 

4. There was no cohesive agreement from the rebels, because they aren't cohesive

The Free Syrian Army (FSA) indicated that it would recognize the holiday, but it has been plagued by disorganization and infighting while radical jihadist elements have become the most organized rebel force. The Associated Press reports that the first serious battle on Friday involved the radical Islamist group Jabhat al-Nusra, which "rejected the cease-fire from the outset."

5. There is a grinding battle going on in Aleppo

Jabhat al-Nusra stormed a Syrian military base  outside of, Maaret al-Numan, a strategic town on the road to the northern city of Aleppo. In the city the two sides have been engaging in street-by-street urban warfare for weeks with neither side able to score a decisive victory, AP reports.

6. The tie goes to the defender

The strategic advantage of a ceasefire always goes to the regime. They are well-supplied and centralized. Every advance during every day means quite a bit to a rebel force without enough food or bullets while every delay is an opportunity for the regime to further consolidate, regroup and make a case for the continuance of the status quo. 

7. Religious ceasefires rarely last, in fact, they're often used for surprise attacks

Yom Kippur War anyone?

Religious holidays, especially Ramadan, are more often a pretense than a recognized peacetime.   Iraqis fought over most of the Ramadan's in the Iraq War, Palestinians launched the Intifada during Ramadan, the Indian government suggested a ceasefire with Kashmir in observance of Ramadan which never got off the ground.

The Syrian rebels aren't stupid. They know that the Assad government could possibly use the opportunity to catch them by surprise.

8. This has been no holds barred from the beginning

Why would the rebels trust the guy who has been massacring his own people for more than a year? Why would the regime trust the dissidents who have committed atrocities as well and have clearly been infiltrated by al-Qaeda?

Nevertheless, U.S. diplomat Daniel Serwer said Lakhdar Brahimi wasn't wrong to try and should keep on trying because any temporary truce gives relative moderates on both sides an opportunity to reassert themselves.

SEE ALSO: Professor Explains Why Aleppo And Damascus Are Doomed >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Documents Reveal Hitler's Epic Rant To Senior Nazis 8 Days Before He Died

$
0
0

hitlerHitler told senior Nazis that "everyone has lied to me, everyone has deceived me" just eight days before he killed himself in his bunker, according to newly disclosed documents.

Guy Liddell, the former deputy director general MI5, includes in his diaries a Joint Intelligence Committee paper detailing Hitler's final days.

During a conference on April 22nd, 1945, Hitler gave a speech to his assembled generals and Heinrich Himmler, his minister of the interior.

The report states: "Hitler came in at 8.30 a completely broken man. Only a few army officers were with him. Himmler urged Hitler to leave Berlin.

"Suddenly, Hitler began to make one of his characteristic speeches. 'Everyone has lied to me, everyone has deceived me, non[sic] one has told me the truth.

'The armed forces have lied to me and now the SS has left me in the lurch. The German people has not fought heroically. It deserves to perish.

'It is not I who have lost the war, but the German people'."

The report continues: "Then his face turned purple, his twitching left arm became quiet, and he could not put his left foot on the ground properly.

"Throughout that night he suffered from a nervous collapse and kept on raving that he would meet his end in Berlin."

The report states that he subsequently suffered a "nervous collapse" and "kept on raving that he would meet his end in Berlin."

On the night he killed himself however, Albert Speer, the then minister of armaments, said he was "calm".

"He said... Hitler had at last realised that his star had set and the war was lost. He told Speer that he awaited his death as a release from a hard life of difficulties.

"He said that he could not go out and die fighting on the barricades as he was afraid of merely being wounded and captured by the Russians. He would therefore shoot himself."

While witnesses said Hitler remained defiant to the last, however, Liddell's diaries also contain reference to a letter from Joachim von Ribbentrop, the German foreign minister.

Liddell writes: "He said that neither he nor Hitler had ever wanted a war with England and that he himself had always regarded England as his second home. He was sure the future lay in close collaboration between England and Germany."

SEE ALSO: Amazing Color Photos Of America Preparing For World War II >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Jon Stewart Rails On The Absurdity Of The US Health Care System Refusing To Employ Combat Medics

$
0
0
Jon Stewart, during an exclusive taping which appeared only on the web, interviewed two Army medics with experience in Iraq, who had actually saved lives in combat.
Stewart gave them mock job interviews for a 'nurse's assistant' and a 'school nurse' to illustrate how the veterans were not qualified on paper, and over qualified in experience — essentially falling into a certification gap.
The medics talk about saving people with combat related injuries, and Stewart responds back, "Are you familiar with kick ball? In the job I'm interviewing you for you will have to be familiar with bruising ... " Jon said, "So you don't have the certifications you need to fill these jobs?"
Watch the full clip below: 

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

The World Never Came Closer To Nuclear War Than On January 25, 1995

$
0
0

Black Brant Missile

In the 67 years since the detonation of the world's first nuclear weapon there is only one time the so-called nuclear briefcases were broken out and opened up. On January 25, 1995 they not only opened, they nearly launched Russia's nuclear arsenal at the United States.

When Norwegian Kolbjørn Adolfsen gave the nod to send a Black Brant rocket from the Andøya Rocket Range off the northwest coast of Norway to study the aurora borealis, he wasn't concerned at all.

Sure the Brant is a large, four-stage rocket that would fly to 930 miles above the earth near Russia, but he'd contacted the proper Kremlin authorities and hadn't given the flight a second thought.

What Adolfsen didn't know when he left the rocket base shortly after the missile was launched, is that the Brant's radar signature looks just like a U.S. sub-launched Trident missile.

The radar operators at Russia's Olenegorsk early warning station promptly reported the incoming missile to their superiors, but not a soul on duty within the military had been notified of Adolfsen's plans.

The officers at Olenegork believed it could be the first leg of a U.S. nuclear attack.

Four years after the Berlin Wall came down and Russia was in the throes of change, stable systems had been demolished and replacements had yet to fall into place. One thing that had gotten only more developed since 1991, however, was the Kremlin's mistrust of the United States.

So as the Brant streaked its way near Russian airspace, military officers had to decide if this was an electro-magnetic pulse attack that would disable their radar and allow for a full on American attack, and what they should do about it.

The matter was decided when the Brant separated, dropped one of its engines, and fired up another. The radar signature now looked so much like a multiple re-entry vehicle (MRV), a missile carrying multiple nuclear warheads, that military officers no longer had any doubt.

There were now five minutes during which the missile's trajectory would be un-tracked by Russian radar, and when it could strike Moscow; a slice of time that was devoted to deciding whether to launch a counterattack.

Boris Yeltsin was alerted, and immediately given the Cheget, the "nuclear briefcase" that connects senior officials while they decide whether or not to launch Russia's nuclear weapons. Nuclear submarine commanders were ordered to full battle alert and told to stand by.

Apparently Yeltsin doubted the U.S. would launch a surreptitious attack and within five minutes, Russian radar came back confirming the missile was heading harmlessly out to sea.

Russian citizens didn't find about about the incident for weeks, and of course it's been reported in the U.S. news since. But the event never achieved the renown of the Cuban Missile Crisis, though it seems to have brought us even closer to the brink of nuclear war. 

We thought it an interesting enough story to tell again.

Now: Check out the plane that's saved more US troops than any other >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


This Plane May Have Saved More US Troops Than Any Other In The World

$
0
0

A-10

When you're hunkered down behind a thin sliver of cover taking heavy fire, there is no more reassuring sound than the twin engines of the A-10 Thunderbolt screaming in from the distance.

Check out the A-10 >

That's what you think anyway, until you hear the 30mm Gatling gun that pounds out 3,500 rounds per minute at the guys trying to kill you.

Then you know the most reassuring sound you'll ever hear.

The A-10 is an old plane that continues to provide massive air support to ground troops, both with that cannon, and with missiles that can take out a main battle tank in a single shot.

We looked at the A-10 over the summer, with it's distinctive shape, and historic time in service and decided it was time for another look.

Sometimes old really is good. 

The A-10 Thunderbolt II was introduced to service in the disco-driven year of 1977 — two years after Vietnam officially ended



Troops on the ground refer to the A-10 as the "Warthog" or "Hog"



What the 'Hog' lacks in pretty lines and smooth curves it makes up for in sheer determination and toughness and may suffer extreme damage while still holding to the skies



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

A Florida Plane Carrying Absentee Ballots To US Troops In Afghanistan Crashed A Week Ago

$
0
0

army voting absentee ballot

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Federal officials say that absentee ballots being sent to U.S. military serving in Afghanistan may have been burned in a plane crash.

A top official in the Federal Voting Assistance Program this week notified election officials across the nation that a transport plane crashed at Shindad Air Base on Oct. 19.

The crash resulted in the destruction of 4,700 pounds of mail inbound to troops serving in the area.

Federal officials in their email to state election offices said they did not know if any ballots were destroyed. They also said the lost mail was limited to one zip code.

But they recommended that election officials resend a new ballot to anyone who requested one since the first ballot may have been destroyed in the crash and fire.

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

A Close Look At Iran's Burgeoning Military Arsenal

$
0
0

MiG-29

Iran's military has 545,000 active personnel and some of the most advanced military technology of anyone out there.

The thing is, the United States gave them a lot of it.

See the weapons >

Granted, it wasn't the modern Iran that  we stocked up with some of the hottest tech of the time, but the pre-revolutionary country that, at one point, was a key ally of the United States in the Middle East. 

Still, Iran has developed their own military industrial complex to develop, maintain, and upgrade military resources. 

And they've gotten pretty good at it.

So ignoring their possible but unconfirmed nuclear program, we run down all the military toys that we found the Iranians are playing with. 

Decades of United Nations embargo and a bunch of advanced Soviet and American tech laying around meant that Iran got busy, designing original weapons systems. We'll take a look at that stuff for the first time here. 

The AH-1J SeaCobra

The United States sold 202 of these helicopters to Iran from 1975-1978. As of right now, only around fifty remain in service.

Iran used the helicopters with disputed success in the Iran-Iraq War. 

The AH-1W, a similar aircraft, remains a cornerstone of the U.S. Marine Corps' attack helicopter fleet. 

The attack helicopter carries a crew of two, a max speed of 219 mph, and a service ceiling of 10,500 feet. It's 53 feet long.

Iran has also built an upgrade the Panha 2091, from AH-1J aircraft. Their efficacy is unknown. 

 



The RIM-66 Surface to Air Missile

A naval missile system designed by the United States and exported to multiple nations, these rockets pack a punch.

Entering into service in 1967 and made by Raytheon, this guided missile system can travel at three-and-a-half times the speed of sound and have an operational range of up to 90 nautical miles. 

The rockets are 15 feet long. 

The Iran Navy has these installed on a number of missile boats and frigates.



The S-300 missile system

This one is unconfirmed, but Iran claims that they have them and the sources are plausible. 

And if they do have the S-300, that's a pretty big deal. 

Iran claimed they had inked a contract with Russia on some of the systems, which the Russians categorically deny. 

They may have gotten some from Gaddafi. They may have scored some from Croatia or Belarus, or some parts from Russia. They have made the Bavar 373 system, which Iran claims has the same capabilities as the S-300. 

Still, this system would be quite a get. 

NATO called it the S-10 Gladiator. The Soviets developed in the 1970s, and it's been continually upgraded until the cessation of production in 2011. 

It's one of the most potent anti-aircraft missile systems in the field today.

There are even variations that have been designed to intercept ballistic missiles. The radar system can track 100 targets at once, and can simultaneously engage 12 of them. 

The 23 foot missiles used weigh two tons and have a range of between 56 and 93 miles. They travel at six times the speed of sound. The missile system has never been used in combat as yet, but NATO has trained for that eventuality



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

The US And Britain Are Putting Final Touches On A Possible Military Operation Against Iran

$
0
0

British Navy Ship

LONDON (AP) — Britain is involved in military contingency planning with the United States over Iran and other potential flashpoints in the Middle East, officials said Friday — but they insisted the talks are not a prelude to a pre-emptive strike against Tehran's nuclear program.

Prime Minister David Cameron's office confirmed that routine military planning is being carried out with the U.S. and other allies on a range of scenarios, including on the potential use by American forces of British bases, some of which can act as staging posts for missions to the Middle East.

The Guardian newspaper reported in Friday's editions that the U.S. had asked Britain to use its bases in Cyprus, and British territory in the Atlantic and Indian Ocean, to help build up forces in the Gulf. It reported that move was regarded as a contingency in case of the need for strikes to halt Tehran's nuclear program.

"Contingency planning is something which we do as a matter of routine. Obviously we are working closely, for example with the United States, as we have done in the past, regarding the use of U.K. bases," a spokeswoman for Cameron told reporters, on condition of anonymity in line with policy.

"We routinely speak to our counterparts in the United States. We don't get into details of those discussions, but we have in the past cooperated on the use of U.K. bases," she said. The U.S. military used British bases in the buildup to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Britain's Foreign Office said that the U.K. was involved in "prudent" contingency planning with its allies, including the U.S.

"The government does not believe that military action against Iran is the right option at this time, but we are not taking any option off the table," Cameron's spokeswoman said.

She insisted that Britain remained committed to a policy of imposing ever tighter sanctions against Iran, while also seeking to engage Tehran in talks aimed at ensuring the country has access to civilian nuclear power but abandons its alleged pursuit of an atomic weapon. Tehran insists it is not developing nuclear arms.

Britain's government declined to comment on The Guardian's claim that U.K. attorney general Dominic Grieve had issued legal advice cautioning that any involvement in a pre-emptive strike on Iran — including cooperating on bases — would violate international law.

The newspaper, citing unnamed government sources, reported that in his advice, the government's chief legal advisor had stated Iran did not constitute "a clear and present threat."

Israel has been especially wary of Iran's nuclear plans, and has warned it would use military force to prevent the Islamic Republic from obtaining atomic weapons.

In a speech earlier this month, Cameron said he had warned Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that any strike on Iran would risk bolstering support for the regime in Tehran. He insisted that international measures, including a European ban on Iranian oil imports, were crippling Iran's economy.

"We need the courage to give these sanctions time to work," Cameron said.

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Micro-Drones Combined With DNA Hacking Could Create A Very Scary Future

$
0
0

Mosquito Drone Mock Up

Sightings of insect-sized micro drones have been occurring for years, but combined with the direction of genome sequencing outlined in this Atlantic piece — the pair make for a futuristic and potentially deadly mix.

Even back in 2007, when Vanessa Alarcon was a college student attending an anti-war protest in Washington, D.C. she heard someone shout, "Oh my God, look at those."

"I look up and I'm like, 'What the hell is that?'" she told The Washington Post. "They looked like dragonflies or little helicopters. But I mean, those are not insects," she continued.

A lawyer there at the time confirmed they looked like dragonflies, but that they "definitely weren't insects".

And he's probably right. In 2006 Flight International reported that the CIA had been developing micro UAVs as far back as the 1970s and had a mock-up in its Langley headquarters since 2003.

While we can go on listing roachbots, swarming nano drones, and synchronized MIT robots — private trader and former software engineer Alan Lovejoy points out that the future of nano drones could become even more unsettling.

DNALovejoy says "Such a device could be controlled from a great distance and is equipped with a camera, microphone. It could land on you and then use its needle to take a DNA sample." 

Assuming all that to be possible, the Atlantic  paints a complimentary scenario.

Authors Andrew Hessel, Marc Goodman, and Steven Kotler outline futuristic human genome work that evolves from the very real GE $100 million breast cancer challenge.

In the group's scenario a bunch of brilliant freelancers receive bids to design personalized virus' offering customized cures for the sick.

Say you get pancreatic cancer, instead of chemo' — the first step in treatment will be decoding your genome — which costs about $1,000 right now and takes a couple of days.

An eternity when you're rife with cancer, no doubt, but a far cry from the two years and $300 million it required less than a decade-and-a-half ago.

But imagine, the three writers ask: it's 2015, and with information about the disease and your exclusive genome sequence, tomorrow's virologists will have only a simple design problem on their hands.

The problem will be freelanced out for bids, like a brochure design on Elance, and the winning design will be a formula that'll rid your body of the cancer.

All of this is pretty plausible, if not a bit short on the timeline, but imagine the request for proposal of your pancreatic cancer cure was something else.

Lamba RepressorImagine it was the genome of a particular African leader recruiting children to fight his wars, and that his DNA had been high-jacked in 2009 at the UN by order of Hillary Clinton.

Same scenario applies. The request for a drug tailored to that particular genome is accepted. It's paid for and forwarded to an online bio-marketplace, which sends it to a synthesis start-up that turns "the 5,984 base-pair blueprint into actual genetic material."

Here the future of drones and virology could intersect.

A few days later tablets are delivered to a group that dissolves them and injects the liquid into a handful of micro-drones. The team releases the drones and infects the people in the African leader's circle of advisors or family.

The infected come down with flu like symptoms, coughs and sneezes that release billions of harmless virus particles — but when they bring their symptoms in the vicinity of the African leader — the particles change.

Once the virus particles are exposed to that very specific DNA sequence, a secondary function within their design unlocks. In the Atlantic piece the target is the U.S. president via sneezing Harvard students, but the effect would be the same. In that case it was a "fast-acting neuro-destructive disease that produced memory loss and, eventually, death."

Same for the African leader, though the symptoms could be tailored an infinite number of ways. Designed to reflect a uniquely local affliction like Dengue Fever, or to appear like symptoms of a genetic condition.

The drone and bio-technologies are approaching the point where something like this is theoretically possible, even if for now, it's only imagination. 

The Atlantic piece called Hacking the President's DNA is great and may be found here

Now: See how close to nuclear war the world came in 1995 > 

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Getting Married Is The Single Worst Thing A Young Marine Can Do

$
0
0

marine corps pinterestSomewhere between the peak and the valley is the normal; where a human finds themselves most waking hours.

I walked down the aisle on October 6, took the plunge, and pledged half of everything I do not yet own to my woman.

As I walked along the smiling faces I thought of all of those marriage casualties who had come before me, crawling along the sidelines and tugging at the extra fabric on my tux.

Of course, two of them were my parents, but blessed am I to have grown up with four of the greatest. Many people were married when I was in the service, and today most of the couples have dissolved the ties that once bound them.

The rumor had spread to Fallujah, Iraq in early 2005 that some of the wives of our unit had been caught running a brothel on our home base in Hawaii. As per many great substance-lacking rumors this one came with the catch that the reason our chain of command had not informed anyone was because they didn’t want Marines in a combat theater going ape-shit with their loaded weapons while contemplating a different warrior's welcome home than originally anticipated.

When we finally came home it turned out the story was true; many of those wives had fled and spent the deployment money as well. I specifically remember standing in some line behind a Marine who said, “After all of that (war/battle/survival) I just want my truck, but she won’t give it back. … This is fuck*d up shit!”

These are scary stories — colder than the poles, but like combat either the fuck*d Marine carries on, or dies.

Most carry on. Even given the crippling statistics a very few have been able to make it work. The reason strange and cruel divorce was such a happenstance in the Marines had to do with very young men marrying usually a high school sweetheart (first kiss), taking her far away from home and planting her in a house in Hawaii, where she finds herself alone for the first time in her life, for a year after the new husband deploys.

Looking at this raw situation honestly, it either sets a young woman up for a very lonely year of sacrifice, or the best year she has ever had with an endless surplus of tax-free deployment money just a pin number away. I don’t judge because I have not been a nineteen-year-old woman married to a rich nineteen-year-old Marine — all of our money is expendable when the house and food are paid for by Uncle Sam — the drill instructors warned us about such women.
  
I was married in Long Beach, Mississippi; we had a real Southern wedding and to say it went perfect does not give it justice. My step-brother/brother Michael found it appropriate to mention that never in a million years could he picture my wedding being in the South, making reference to our upbringing in suburban Southern California and on how this was a true act of Southern hospitality that left men from our background awe-stricken.

I find it important as a combat veteran to associate everything with war so that I may appreciate a greater importance and assign meaning to this thing that I find so meaningless and time consuming. The character “Walter” in the 1997 film “The Big Lebowski” had a knack for doing the same thing.

I think that civilians focus on such caricatures because like many stereotypes, this one has merit, akin to one of a grandfather barking at his kids, “You think this is bad? Let me tell you a little story called the battle of …” I am surprised to have found such a great match and to be so happy, but being surprised at this surprised me so greatly that I felt like analyzing why.

I am a child of divorce, which has a negative connotation I do not accept as mentioned above. Where I come from, it was strange not to have divorced parents. My parents remarried two beautiful people and I cannot imagine a happier childhood without them or the siblings I was raised with, but I can imagine an unhappier childhood had they decided to continue fighting it out (risk/reward).
  
My love Katharine married me and I had one of those tunnel vision moments where I felt time stop and the computer in my head registering something for a long “save as” (happiest moment) to replace the previous “save as” (surviving Iraq).

Earlier in the morning I had my sunrise cigarette and found myself overwhelmed with emotion as I understood that this beautiful day would never be known by the young men who died single in Iraq 2004-05 (Walter Sobchak) Semper Fidelis, something known only to a warrior.

It is this understanding and respect for death that I have found the most meaningful lesson in life learned from war. Death will eventually take us all as it has everyone before, but we as living human beings, despite origin in culture and religion, always seem to find it important to celebrate certain living things universally.

I could feel connected to early man walking down the aisle the way I could feel a certain transcendence walking into battle. We were lucky to have our loved ones, I am sure other weddings full of unstable in-laws could understandably go quite another way; in grace our new Anderson family is blessed.

This moment was an opportunity for reflection; there was a girl I would write letters to when I was in Iraq back when I really didn’t know shit. Now I know some shit and the shit that I do know is deep. If I had not done everything I did the way that I did I never would have met my Mississippi bride in Portland, Oregon, she helps heal me and I now know what it means to be happy to be alive.

Things get better and sometimes they go backward but to me it is all worth the dime I paid to ride this ride. I have had the experience and there is so much more to come, and when I reflect again somewhere in time’s never-certain future I will know more than I do today just like they knew yesterday until there is no more day.

My dead brothers will walk with me and all of the others who remember them, that is part of our service, in this our joy is shared and the important sting of their loss is a reminder to remember how different this gathering of family could be and how each one was a loss that eternally disrupts history.

When I awoke the day after Corporal Michael Cohen was killed I had an epiphany that life would forever be this way, I knew he would be attached to me for every happy moment of my life, but he tells me it’s only because he wants to see too, so I let him.

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Satellite Images Offers The Best Proof Of A 'Surgical' Air Strike Against Sudan's Arms Plant

$
0
0

Sudan Plant

An explosion and fire at a Sudanese munitions factory this week appears to have been caused by airstrikes, a US-based non-profit monitoring group said Saturday.

The Satellite Sentinel Project started by Hollywood star George Clooney said satellite imagery showed six large craters, each approximately 16 meters (52 feet) across, at the Yarmouk military factory in the Sudanese capital Khartoum.

The weapons plant exploded and caught fire shortly after midnight on Wednesday. The SSP said craters at the scene of the explosion were consistent with the kind of damage created upon impact by by air-delivered munitions.

Satellite images made less than two weeks before the blast showed that 40 shipping containers had been stacked next to a shed-like building at the location, according to the SSP, which said those images were "consistent with the presence of highly volatile cargo in the epicenter of the explosions."

"If the explosions resulted from a rocket or missile attack against material stored in the shipping containers, then it was an effective surgical strike that totally destroyed any container that may have remained," said the group, which did not say who it believed was responsible for the strike.

"The explosions destroyed two buildings and heavily damaged at least 21 others, all within 700 meters of the epicenter," the SSP continued in its statement.

"Visible damage includes roof panels blown off and scattered around the area, windows blown out, and walls knocked down," it said, adding that the shed appears to have been completely "pulverized" in the blast.

The SSP, which conducts monitoring of the border between Sudan and South Sudan, aims to deter and document war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The group says its goal is to systematically monitor and report on potential global security hotspots in real-time, relying on satellite imagery, data analysis and sources on the ground. It has documented violent attacks, atrocities and mass graves in Sudan.

The SSP was founded in December 2010 by Hollywood actor Clooney -- an outspoken activist on the violence in Sudan -- and John Prendergast, once a member of former US president Bill Clinton's national security team and one of the founders of the Enough Project, which aims to end genocide and crimes against humanity in conflict-ridden areas of Africa.

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


This Former Cricket Star Turned US Drone Critic Was Pulled From His Plane On The Way To The States

$
0
0

Imran Khan

Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician, claimed he was taken off an international flight by US immigration officials and questioned about his views on drones and jihad before being allowed into the country, it emerged on Saturday

Mr Khan has emerged as a leading critic of US policy in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and his party is poised to make a breakthrough in elections due next year.

In a series of messages on Twitter, he described being stopped by US officials in Toronto on Friday.

"I was taken off from plane and interrogated by US Immigration in Canada on my views on drones. My stance is known. Drone attacks must stop," he wrote, adding that the delay caused him to miss his flight and a fund raising event in New York.

His anti-drone stance and his push for peace talks with insurgents in Afghanistan and Pakistan has led to accusations that he is sympathetic to Islamic extremists and earned him the nickname Taliban Khan.

Writing in The Daily Telegraph on Saturday, he dismissed such accusations and warned that Pakistan faced a never ending war unless the country's leaders engaged with the militant groups "Unless we address these very different groups and understand their motivation, senseless military operations will push all of them together, create yet more collateral damage and increase terrorism in Pakistan," he said.

Earlier this month he led thousands of supporters in a peace convoy demanding an end to drone strikes, which he says kill thousands of innocent people and radicalise scores of young men.

A spokeswoman for the US State Department confirmed the incident.

"We are aware that Imran Khan was briefly delayed in Toronto before boarding the next flight to the United States," she told Pakistani media. "The issue was resolved. Mr Khan is welcome in the United States."

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Hizbollah Is Thinking Of Abandoning Syria And It's A Pretty Big Deal

$
0
0

syria

Hizbollah has been one of the staunchest supporters of the regime of President Bashar al-Assad, but now there are bitter arguments within its ranks about whether it is time to change course.

The giant banner with a portrait of Bashar al-Assad, strung across a busy street in South Beirut, proclaimed loyalty to the Syrian president — and cursed his enemies.

“Those who hate the Lion of Syria are sons of bitches,” it read, in Arabic slang with a play on the meaning of the Assad name.

Elsewhere in the Arab world he may be hated as a bloody tyrant, but in Hizbollah’s South Beirut stronghold Mr Assad is still a hero.

A couple of streets away, the British hostage Terry Waite was held captive for four years until his release in 1991, and nearby is the site of the notorious massacre of Sabra and Shatila where perhaps as many as 3500 people were murdered by pro-Israeli militias in 1982.

Hizbollah’s reclusive leader Hassan Nasrallah, the undisputed head of Lebanon’s Shia Muslims, lives nearby in a heavily guarded apartment complex. Hizbollah’s own police force, in khaki fatigues, patrol the streets, which are noticeably more crowded and scruffier than in the centre of Beirut with its nightclubs and fashionable shops.

Hizbollah - “the party of God” - needed help from neighbouring Syria to become the most powerful force in Lebanese politics, and it could always depend on the ruling family in Damascus during its wars with Israel.

Now in Mr Assad’s time of need Lebanon’s Shias have mostly been loyal in return - providing logistical and moral support and even sending fighters into Syria’s civil war to kill his enemies.

But in Lebanon there are as many Christians and Sunni Muslims as there are Shia. Now, as doubts grow that Mr Assad will survive and Syria’s civil war begins to spread into Lebanon, The Sunday Telegraph has been told of secret arguments raging inside Hizbollah’s ranks about whether the time has come to stop backing Mr Assad.

To many in South Beirut, where Hizbollah runs hospitals, schools, and rubbish collections, and pays pensions to the families of slain fighters, that would be unthinkable.

“Bashar is a major backer of our resistance, and so we are for him,” said Ahmad Suleiman, 43, a burly Hizbollah loyalist.

Mr Suleiman’s house was blasted into rubble in an air strike during the bloody 2006 war with Israel that Hizbollah claims to have won; in 1996 his brother was killed by an Israeli tank shell, making him “a martyr” he says proudly. He can remember “arrogant” Israeli soldiers patrolling his streets during the invasion of Lebanon, when he was a boy — streets that are still scarred with bullets from that time.

“The resistance”, as Hizbollah is called by its supporters, relied on Syrian and Iranian weapons and training to fight the Israelis. A bond was thus forged between Damascus, Tehran and South Beirut that until now has always looked unbreakable.

Many Hizbollah supporters insist it is Assad who is the victim, not the opposition, and that he is worthy of their support.

“In Syria there are terrorist attacks, torture, killing and beheading, all done by the enemies of the regime,” Mr Suleiman said. “This is not a revolution like the one in Egypt. Ninety per cent of the Syrians support Bashar. He is a good man and he will survive.

“If it looks as if he is in real danger, we will send thousands of our men into Syria. And if America or Nato is stupid enough to intervene, we will be there defending Arab lands.”

There were reports of fresh fighting in Syria on Saturday, with opposition activists claiming Syrian artillery bombarded cities, in breach of a truce meant to mark the Muslim Eid al-Adha holiday. Both the government and rebels agreed a truce. Mohammed Doumany, an activist from the Damascus suburb of Douma, said he had counted 15 explosions in an hour and said at least two civilians had been killed. There were also reports of heavy fighting along the Syria-Turkey border.

Hizbollah has a private army, regarded as a terrorist organisation by the United States, which is much stronger than Lebanon’s national army - yet it is also inside Lebanon’s government as part of an uneasy arrangement of rival political parties.

Since it was founded in the 1980s it has built a reputation as a formidably disciplined organisation, tolerating no public dissent. But a year ago the rival Palestinian militant organisation Hamas, which controls Gaza, abandoned its support for Mr Assad. Now, insiders say, Hizbollah is engaged in a fierce debate behind closed doors over whether to follow suit.

“There are different points of view, with some saying that we should push for a settlement within Syria and not bank on Assad staying,” said one Lebanese with connections to senior Hizbollah circles.

Some Hizbollah members, including clerics, fear that their support for Mr Assad is dragging them into a dangerous fight with Sunni Arabs - the other side of Islam’s main sectarian divide - in Syria and Lebanon, he said.

They say it is now urgent to end their support for Mr Assad, so that a new relationship can be formed with whoever comes to power in Syria next.

“There is an awareness inside Iran and Hizbollah that they are going to have confrontation with the Sunnis, or are going to have to bridge the gap between them,” the source said. “The hardest topic is Syria. The future of Hizbollah and the Shia is directly related to the future of Syria. If Bashar is to be sacrificed, let’s sacrifice him and not Syria.”

The most dramatic sign of dissent within Hizbollah is the cancellation of a forthcoming party convention that is usually held every three years - the first time anybody can remember it being dropped. The official explanation is that it would be a security risk.

But a Shia politician from an important political family said: “They are not able to hold their convention because they are afraid they cannot agree on Syria.”

Disagreement is said to be strongest between civilian Hizbollah members, who are more likely to favour cutting links with Damascus, and its powerful military wing, trained and indoctrinated by Iran and still fiercely loyal to the Syrian regime.

“I have heard that the division is deep between the Lebanese branch of Hizbollah and the military. Hassan Nasrallah decided to cancel the convention,” said the source. “He was worried he would not be able to come up with a final resolution.”

Mr Nasrallah pledged his loyalty to the Damascus regime in public several times at the beginning of the crisis, but has shown much less enthusiasm about doing so recently.

“Nasrallah is anxious,” said one observer of the South Beirut political scene. “At every crossroads he watches closely what is happening.”

Car bombings and clashes between militias, alarming signs that Syria’s violent struggle is spreading to Lebanon, have forced many of his followers to wonder where their involvement with Mr Assad is leading them.

Dozens of Lebanese have died in fighting between pro- and anti-Assad factions in Lebanon’s cities this year, and the car bomb assassination nine days ago of the country’s spy chief, who was one of Syria’s biggest enemies in Beirut, brought back frightening memories of Lebanon’s own 15-year-long civil war.

Beyond Lebanon, Hizbollah’s prestige, once sky-high, now looks tarnished. Instead of being praised among Arabs for standing up to Israel, it is seen by many as the lackey of a bloodstained dictator.

When Hamas abandoned its support for Syria, under pressure from Palestinians appalled by the regime’s slaughter, Ismail Haniya, its leader in Gaza, dramatically announced it during Friday prayers in Cairo. “I salute the Syrian people who seek freedom, democracy and reform,” he said. There were calls of “No Hizbollah and no Iran” from the crowd.

For sticking with the Damascus regime, Hizbollah has been criticised by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the Gulf States.

Its support for the Assad regime was “an obvious strategic mistake”, said Abdel-Halim Qandil, the co-founder of the new left-of-centre Egyptian political party Kefaya (Enough). “It would have been better to be neutral or to keep silent,” he said.

There is growing unease even among Hizbollah’s grass-roots supporters in its political heartlands of South Beirut, and speculation that it will lose out politically as well.

“My mother has always voted for Hizbollah, but she has seen the television pictures of dead children in Syria and she is horrified,” said one Hizbollah supporter. “Of course she is behind the resistance. But for the first time in her life I think she may not vote for them in the next election.”

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

The Manhattan Veterans Hospital Is Evacuating All Of Its Patients

$
0
0

Manhattan VA

Anticipating Hurricane Sandy's arrival the Manhattan Campus of the VA NY Harbor Healthcare System has ordered all its patients evacuated from the facility at 423 East 23rd Street.

In addition, all NY Harbor campuses will be closed tomorrow. Sandy is supposed to reach land tomorrow and Mayor Bloomberg has ordered everyone in a NYC 'Zone A'  to evacuate.

By comparison the VA only did a partial evacuation during Hurricane Irene in August 2011.

From the VA website:

Due to the path of Hurricane Sandy, VA New York Harbor Healthcare System has begun an evacuation of all patients at the Manhattan hospital facility, located at 423 East 23 Street.

Family members may call 212-686-7500 and dial 0 for questions about loved ones’ locations. All clinics and CBOCs at all NY Harbor campuses will be closed tomorrow. If you have questions about an appointment, call Centralized Scheduling at 1-877-877-9267.

Remember to keep an emergency supply kit on hand. It's important to prepare your family for unexpected disasters & emergencies. For a list of things to do to secure your home & keep family safe, visit www.ready.gov.

Thank you & stay safe.

See the latest map and Sandy news >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Army Training Presentation Slams President George W. Bush

$
0
0

When the Artillery School of Practice founded in 1824 at Ft. Monroe, Va. grew inadequate for the expanding nation's needs, the United States Army Command and General Staff College was built in Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas.

A 130-year-old postgraduate institution, it's made up of several smaller schools like the Combined Arms Center (CAC).

The CAC provides training materials like the presentation from which these slides were taken. Meant for all Army Major's moving on to Lt. Colonel, these three slides make the unusual move of slamming a former U.S. President.

The slides talk about the "risks of a leader who is too optimistic," along with a picture of Bush giving his notorious "Mission Accomplished" speech in 2003.

The risks include "not planning accurately for the future, not taking steps to mitigate risk, and diminish something tragic."

The third slide immediately follows, with a different image overlaid where the Bush picture had been.

CAC Presentation

CAC

CAC

Now: See how close the world came to nuclear war in 1995 >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Iran Says It Has Loads Of Sensitive Military Data From Its Israeli Drone Mission

$
0
0

Hizbollah Hassan Nasrallah

Iran is in possession of data transmitted by an unmanned Hezbollah drone that overflew "restricted" sites and bases in Israel this month, a defence official said.

The drone "transmitted live data, photographing sensitive Israeli bases," chair of the Iranian parliament's defence commission, Esmaeel Kosari, told Iran's Arabic-language Al-Alam television.

"The photos of restricted areas are in Iran's possession," he said in an interview broadcast on Sunday night.

Israel's air force on October 6 shot down the unarmed drone over the Negev desert after it entered the country's airspace from the Mediterranean Sea.

At the time the Israeli military dispelled the notion the drone might have been launched from the Gaza Strip, and was looking into the possibility Hezbollah militants may have dispatched it.

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah boasted on October 11 that his Shiite group sent the drone over Israel, saying the device was "Iranian built and assembled in Lebanon."

"It overflew sensitive and important installations for dozens of kilometres until the enemy spotted it near (the nuclear site) Dimona," Nasrallah said without identifying the installations.

Iran confirmed Nasrallah's claim, and scoffed at Israel's air defences.

Defence Minister Ahmad Vahidi said the drone flight "shattered everything that was said about the Iron Dome system" -- Israel's air defence shield.

Speaking to Al-Alam on Sunday, Kosari also echoed a claim by Vahidi earlier in the day that Iran had more advanced drone than the one Hezbollah used.

"Iran currently possesses unmanned aircraft which have more advanced technology than the drone that Hezbollah forces recently flew over the Zionist regime's airspace," Vahidi told reporters on Sunday.

Iran regularly boasts about advances in military and scientific fields, but in most cases fails to provide proof they were ever carried out. Western military experts regularly cast doubt on its claims.

Vahidi meanwhile rejected a notion that draconian economic sanctions against Tehran's disputed nuclear programme had affected the military and its advances.

"Unfair Western sanctions have no effect on boosting the defence and deterrent prowess of the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran," he said.

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 31607 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>